The following Construction practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
While tort claims are not as common in construction projects as breach of contract claims, they do still arise and it is not uncommon for a claimant to advance a claim in tort alongside, or in the alternative to, a claim in contract.
The most relevant tort in construction is the tort of negligence—this includes ‘professional negligence’ where the negligent act has been committed by a person or company holding itself out to be a professional.
This Practice Note considers some of the key issues concerning negligence in the context of construction projects, including liability for personal injury and damage to other property (including the complex structure theory), liability for pure economic loss (including whether there has been an assumption of responsibility), co-existing duties in contract and tort, liability for independent contractors, contributory negligence and the ability to limit or exclude liability for negligence.
For an overview of the various torts, see: Tort, negligence and nuisance claims—overview.
Four elements must be established for a claim in negligence to succeed:
a duty of care
a breach of that duty of care—in a professional negligence claim this means a failure to exercise ‘reasonable care and skill’ (see Practice Note: Standard of care in professional negligence claims)
damage caused by the breach
foreseeability of that damage
For more information about establishing a claim in negligence, see
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note covers the legal framework and regulatory guidance to be considered in determining whether an arrangement constitutes a contract of insurance and the possible consequences of carrying on activities relating to a contract of insurance without the requisite regulatory permissionsThe
Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and considered against the general background of
Company directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their services will need to be
This Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of mistake on the contract and
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.