The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
It would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear. To combat this, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) contains the separate offences of 'tipping off' and 'prejudicing an investigation'.
The offences of tipping off and prejudicing an investigation share common features but are aimed at distinctly different offending actions. The tipping off provisions apply only to the regulated sector and are triggered where the individual who knows or suspects a disclosure (or SAR) has been made under POCA 2002, s 337 (protected disclosure) or POCA 2002, s 338 (authorised disclosure) (see Practice Note: Authorised disclosure, protected disclosure and appropriate consent).
The prejudicing an investigation offence is more general in its application and is directed to the individual with knowledge of the existence of an investigation of various types.
Note: giving any advice on making a SAR before any disclosure is made does not contravene these provisions.
Offences can also be committed by those who fail to disclose information when there is a requirement to do so, see Practice Note: Money laundering offences—failure to disclose offences.
The Terrorism Act 2000 also contains a tipping off offence (see
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the different categories of contractual damages that may be available for financial loss (pecuniary loss), ie expectation-based damages, reliance-based damages and gains-based damages.For guidance on contractual damages generally, see Practice Note: Contractual
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
There may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the shoes of one of the original parties. This is
Source of the doctrine of the separation of powersThe origins of the doctrine are often traced to John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689), in which he identified the 'executive' and 'legislative' powers as needing to be separate.‘… it may be too great a temptation to human frailty, apt to
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.