The following Dispute Resolution practice note Produced in partnership with Charles Spragge of Druces provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note sets out when and how parties can seek to limit or exclude liability for misrepresentations by reference to section 3 of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 (MA 1967) and the reasonableness test under section 11 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA 1977). Note: as from 1 October 2015, UCTA 1977 applies only in respect of business-to-business contracts; for consumer contracts, see instead sections 61–76 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015).
For guidance on when a party may rescind a contract or recover damages for a misrepresentation, see Practice Notes:
Misrepresentation—damages as a remedy
Misrepresentation—rescission as a remedy
For guidance on entire agreement clauses and their use in limiting or excluding liability for misrepresentation, see Practice Note: Contract interpretation—interpreting entire agreement clauses.
For guidance on non-reliance clauses in the context of contractual estoppel, see Practice Note: Contractual estoppel.
It is not uncommon (in substantial and complex contracts it is usual) for the parties to agree provisions in their contract that seek to restrict or exclude the rights of one party to bring a claim for misrepresentation. These provisions may appear in the agreement itself or in other documents having contractual effect.
These clauses can be effective to prevent the representee from bringing a successful claim for misrepresentation though they may be subject to the test of reasonableness
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note examines why parties involved in a construction project may enter into an escrow agreement (or escrow deed) to set up an escrow account. It looks at the benefits of paying funds into escrow, how an escrow account operates and the provisions typically found in an escrow
The Public Private Partnership (PPP) models are a popular way for governments to involve private investment, expertise and risk in procuring infrastructure, with the potential to deliver a project more efficiently and economically. One of the most popular PPP models for procuring infrastructure
What is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.Final judgments by
There are two kinds of burden:•the legal burden, and•the evidential burdenThe legal burdenA party has the legal (sometimes called ‘the persuasive’) burden where the onus is on that party to prove a fact or issue in a case to the required standard of proof.The legal burden is generally on the
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.