Licensing—Russia—Q&A guide [Archived] — 2022
Published by a LexisNexis IP expert
Last updated on 11/08/2022

The following IP practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:

  • Licensing—Russia—Q&A guide [Archived]
  • 1. Are there any restrictions on the establishment of a business entity by a foreign licensor or a joint venture involving a foreign licensor and are there any restrictions against a foreign licensor entering into a licence agreement without establishing a subsidiary or branch office? Whether or not any such restrictions exist, is there any filing or regulatory review process required before a foreign licensor can establish a business entity or joint venture in your jurisdiction?
  • 2. Identify the different forms of licence arrangements that exist in your jurisdiction.
  • 3. Does legislation directly govern the creation, or otherwise regulate the terms, of an international licensing relationship? Describe any such requirements.
  • 4. What pre-contractual disclosure must a licensor make to prospective licensees?
  • 5. Are there any requirements to register a grant of international licensing rights with authorities in your jurisdiction?
  • 6. Is your jurisdiction party to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property? The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)? The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs)?
  • 7. Can the licensee be contractually prohibited from contesting the validity of a foreign licensor’s intellectual property rights or registrations in your jurisdiction?
  • 8. What is the effect of the invalidity or expiry of registration of an intellectual property right on a related licence agreement in your jurisdiction? If the licence remains in effect, can royalties continue to be levied? If the licence does not remain in effect, can the licensee freely compete?
  • 9. Is an original registration or evidence of use in the jurisdiction of origin, or any other requirements unique to foreigners, necessary prior to the registration of intellectual property in your jurisdiction?
  • More...

Licensing—Russia—Q&A guide [Archived]

This Practice Note contains a jurisdiction-specific Q&A guide to licensing in Russia published as part of the Lexology Getting the Deal Through series by Law Business Research (published: January 2021).

Authors: Gorodissky & Partners—Sergey Medvedev

1. Are there any restrictions on the establishment of a business entity by a foreign licensor or a joint venture involving a foreign licensor and are there any restrictions against a foreign licensor entering into a licence agreement without establishing a subsidiary or branch office? Whether or not any such restrictions exist, is there any filing or regulatory review process required before a foreign licensor can establish a business entity or joint venture in your jurisdiction?

There are no restrictions on the establishment of a business entity by a foreign licensor or a joint venture involving a foreign licensor in Russia from the intellectual property perspective. Neither are there any restrictions against a foreign licensor entering into an intellectual property licence agreement without establishing a subsidiary or branch office in this jurisdiction. A foreign business entity is free to license its intellectual property subject matter directly or indirectly to the Russian business entity, or create a joint venture with a Russian partner using the appropriate international licensing scheme.

Before a foreign licensor can establish a business entity or joint venture in Russia, it has to undergo the following general tests from a

Related documents:
Key definition:
Subsidiary definition
What does Subsidiary mean?

There are two suggested definitions for the term 'subsidiary', as commonly used in agreements. CA 2006, s 1159 provides that a company is a holding company of another company (its subsidiary) if it satisfies one of three tests, two of which require it to be a member of the other company (as well as to possess certain rights, which go to its voting powers). Membership of a company is a question of fact and the court has found that if a company (company A) has transferred shares in another company (company B) to a lender in connection with the taking of security and the name of that lender or the lender’s nominee has been entered in the register of members, then company A is not a member of company B in respect of those shares: see Enviroco Ltd v Farstad Supply A/S.

Popular documents