The following Competition practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The European Commission’s leniency program rewards undertakings involved in cartels (contrary to Article 101 TFEU) that come forward with evidence and information that enables the Commission to launch an investigation. Leniency is only available to undertakings involved in a cartel; it is not available in relation to other breaches of EU competition law.
The two main principles underlying the Commission’s leniency programme are:
the earlier an applicant approaches the Commission, the greater the reward in terms of immunity from or a reduction in the fine, and
greater rewards will depend on the value added by the information supplied over that which is already in the Commission’s possession.
There are two broad types of reward available under the Commission's leniency programme:
immunity, resulting in 100% reduction in fine, generally available to the first undertaking to provide information about the cartel, and
leniency, resulting in reductions in fines of up to 50%, generally available where the Commission already knows about the cartel to undertakings that provide evidence that adds significant value to the information already in the Commission's possession.
The current leniency policy is set out in the Commission's 2006 Leniency Notice which applies to all cases where an applicant applied for leniency after 8 December 2006. This reflects approaches to leniency in the US which can contribute to streamlining the procedure for applying for
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Breach of statutory dutyThis Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care
Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocolWhen considering whether and how to bring a claim for judicial review, the first step is to consider whether judicial review is be an appropriate means of addressing the issues raised by the case at hand. For further guidance, see Practice Note:
AffrayAffray is an offence created by the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986). It can be tried in either the magistrates’ court or the Crown Court. The magistrates’ court may decline jurisdiction where for example in cases involving a weapon/throwing objects, or conduct that causes serious
Discharge by frustrationCoronavirus (COVID-19): In addition to the below content on force majeure generally, see also:•Coronavirus (COVID-19) toolkit—Contracts•Coronavirus (COVID-19) and contractual obligations—checklisttogether with the Q&A (in the related content pod on the right hand side) for
0330 161 1234