The following Family practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note is impacted by the exit of the UK from the EU on 31 January 2020. This has implications for practitioners considering which courts have jurisdiction to determine a dispute. For guidance, see Practice Note: Brexit and family law. This Practice Note sets out the current position on jurisdiction for petitions for divorce and judicial separation.
Where more than one country may have jurisdiction to hear divorce proceedings, care should be taken to determine which may be the most advantageous jurisdiction for the client. Advice should be taken from a lawyer in the other jurisdiction as to the likely outcome of proceedings on finances or children issues. Time may be of the essence in commencing proceedings where there are competing jurisdictions, as jurisdiction may be determined by which court was first seised of the proceedings.
The courts in England and Wales only have jurisdiction to entertain proceedings for divorce and judicial separation if the court has jurisdiction under Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the Council Regulation on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and in matters of Parental Responsibility (commonly called Brussels II bis) or, where no court of a contracting state has jurisdiction under that Regulation and either of the parties is domiciled in England and Wales on the date when proceedings are begun.
There are separate
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Elements of the offence of perverting the course of justicePerverting the course of justice is a common law offence which can only be tried on indictment in the Crown Court. The elements of the offence are:•a person acts or embarks on a course of conduct•which has a tendency to•and is intended to
Scott Schedules are often very useful in construction disputes. They help to identify the key issues between the parties, and to set out for the judge in a single document a summary of the parties’ rival cases on an item-by-item basis.The need for a Scott Schedule in construction cases arises
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day, ie Friday 31 January 2020, has implications for practitioners considering service out of the jurisdiction. For guidance, see: Cross border considerations—checklist—Service—Brexit specific.This Practice Note explains when an acknowledgment of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.