The following Environment practice note produced in partnership with Landmark Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The court must not grant permission to apply for judicial review unless the applicant has a 'sufficient interest' (ie standing) in the matter to which the application relates.
In general, the court takes a very broad approach to standing and it is unusual for a claim to fail on this issue. However, not every member of public can complain about every potential breach of duty by a public body.
To determine whether an applicant has sufficient interest, the court must look at the substance of the case, including:
the powers and duties of the respondent
the position of the applicant in relation to those powers or duties and to the alleged breach, eg was the applicant involved in the original decision making process?
the remedy sought by the claimant
Therefore, standing is not treated as an isolated issue and is taken within the legal and factual context. Moreover, standing is not a matter which is considered only at the permission stage of judicial review proceedings: it can also be considered by the court at the substantive stage.
'Sufficient interest' is in practice a broad, flexible concept and involves a mixed question of fact and law. It depends on consideration of the relationship between the claimant and the matter to which the claim relates, having regard to all relevant circumstances. In appropriate cases,
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
BREXIT: UK is leaving EU on Exit Day (as defined in the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018). This has an impact on this Practice Note. For further guidance on the impact of Brexit on e-money requirements, see Practice Note: Impact of Brexit: Payment services and electronic money directives—quick
Case number [insert number][In the principal registryORIn the [insert court location] FAMILY court]Sitting at [insert place]Notice of actingBetween[insert petitioner name]Petitionerand[insert respondent name]RespondentTake notice that we [insert name of firm] have been appointed to act as the
Deceit—what is it?A deceit occurs when a misrepresentation is made with the express intention of defrauding a party, subsequently causing loss to that party.The elements of a claim in deceit are:•a clear false representation of fact or law•fraud by the maker, in the sense that they knew that the
This Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of mistake on the contract and
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.