The following Corporate Crime practice note Produced in partnership with Joanne Cecil of Garden Court Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note is concerned with secondary liability, sometimes called accessory liability: the liability that attaches to parties to a joint enterprise.
In criminal law, where two or more parties embark on a joint enterprise, as either a principal or secondary party, each will be liable for acts committed in pursuance of that joint enterprise with the necessary intent, unless the principal goes beyond the scope of what was agreed.
In the 2016 cases of R v Jogee (Appellant) and Ruddock v The Queen, the Supreme Court clarified and restored the test for the mental element of intent which must be established when a defendant is accused of being a secondary party to a crime, see News Analysis: Supreme Court rules on ‘joint enterprise’.
Following R v Jogee, there is no longer a separate category of parasitic accessory liability. Adefendant’s liability is to be determined by reference to ordinary principles of secondary liability.
Where two or more persons embark on a joint enterprise to commit an offence, legal liability will apply to those involved in two ways:
principal liability—one or more of the defendants will be a principal offender. They, by their conduct, commit the offence with the relevant mens rea (so all the elements of the offence can be proven against them individually)
secondary party liability/accessory liability—where a principal is in fact
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Elements of the offence of perverting the course of justicePerverting the course of justice is a common law offence which can only be tried on indictment in the Crown Court. The elements of the offence are:•a person acts or embarks on a course of conduct•which has a tendency to•and is intended to
Fraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the deceived for the Fraud Act 2006
What is a remedial action notice?A remedial action notice is used by enforcement authorities such as the Food Standards Agency (FSA) or a local authority, where there has been a breach of the Food Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013 (FH(E)R 2013) or where an inspection under FH(E)R 2013 is being
Coronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The key implications for civil appeals are set
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.