The following TMT Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
There is no statutory definition of ‘a robot’ in England and Wales and there is no recognised global legal definition of the term. Some jurisdictions have looked to introduce their own definition, for example, South Korean law defines a robot in the following way:
‘An intelligent robot is an autonomous machine that understands its external environment independently, that operates and reacts alone.’
However, this and other attempts to define the term have not been adopted by the criminal or civil law regimes in England and Wales.
There is also no one agreed definition of robot among roboticists. The various definitions reflect specific research interests or design paradigms. Some roboticists qualify robots as mechanical objects that can do three things—they can sense, think and act. A technology does not ‘act’ by offering information in comprehensible form. ‘Acting’ means to have physical influence and therefore a software without physical influence is not a robot. Maja J. Matarić, Professor of Computer Science and Neuroscience and Director of the Center for Robotics and Embedded Systems at the University of Southern California, provided the following definition in 2007:
‘A robot is an autonomous system which exists in the physical world, can sense its environment, and can act on it to achieve some goals.’
As there is currently no legal framework for the civil liability of robots, robots are treated
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Property: [insert name and/or address of the Property] (‘Property’)Purchaser: [insert name, address and (if applicable) company registration number of buyer]Transaction: [insert brief details]1Executive summary1.1Scope of reportThis report is addressed to you [insert buyer’s name] and has been
Convention rights—structure of qualified rightsThe rights preserved under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as set out in the Human Rights Act 1998 Sch 1, can be broadly divided into three groups:•absolute rights—which cannot be interfered with by the state or derogated from even in a
AML and counter-terrorist financing—source of funds and source of wealthSource of funds and wealth was a key focus of the SRA’s Preventing Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism thematic review, published in March 2018. Its findings included that:•most firms understood the distinction between
Pre-trial and case management hearings in the Crown CourtCoronavirus (COVID-19): This Practice Note contains guidance on subjects impacted by the Coronavirus Act 2020 (CA 2020). CA 2020, among other measures, makes provision for the extended use of live links and audio links in criminal proceedings.
0330 161 1234