The following Arbitration practice note produced in partnership with Cyrus Benson of Gibson Dunn, Charline O. Yim of Gibson Dunn, Victoria R. Orlowski of Gibson Dunn and Ankita Ritwik of Gibson Dunn provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note addresses investment treaty arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). It covers the background of the ECT, the investors and investments it protects and the hurdles to establishing jurisdiction under the ECT, including exhausting the requirement to attempt amicable settlement, forum selection constraints, and the exercise of the ECT’s denial of benefits clause. This Practice Note also considers the issue of whether ECT arbitral tribunals have jurisdiction in arbitrations brought by investors from EU Member States against other EU Member States (intra-EU disputes) under the ECT in detail, as this is a significant issue in ECT jurisprudence.
This Practice Note does not cover the substantive standards of protection under the ECT. For information on these aspects, see Practice Note: Investment protection under Energy Charter Treaty.
After the end of the Cold War, a collection of states met to establish a model for energy co-operation to facilitate the development of energy resources, promote energy security and encourage economic integration in former Soviet Union countries. The result of these discussions was the European Energy Charter, a non-binding declaration by which states confirmed their mutual objectives to co-operate in energy-related trade, efficiency, environmental protection and other areas. The signatories further agreed to negotiate a binding agreement to implement their shared objectives.
On this basis
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
IP COMPLETION DAY: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 marks the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. At this point in time (referred to in UK law as ‘IP completion day’), key transitional arrangements come to an end and significant
Methods of statutory interpretation used to resolve ambiguities in legislationIP COMPLETION DAY: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 marks the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. At this point in time (referred to in UK law as ‘IP
What is a public authority?There is no single, universal answer to the question whether a particular organisation is treated, in law, as a public authority.Rather, on one hand the courts have developed case law on which bodies are subject to administrative law through the judicial review procedure;
ECHR, art 5(4)—rights and dutiesThe scope of article 5(4) Article 5(4) of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) provides that: 'Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided
0330 161 1234