The following PI & Clinical Negligence guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
For most canine claims, the dog’s behaviour in the past is all-important.
In a claim in negligence, the claimant must prove that the defendant should have foreseen the risk of injury and taken reasonable steps to prevent it. If the owner had no reason to anticipate the behaviour, it will not be possible to establish blame.
The dog’s history will also be important in a personal injury claim brought under section 2(2) of the Animals Act 1971 (AA 1971) where the dog does not belong to a dangerous species but where it has displayed behaviour that is abnormal for the dog’s species. Unless there is evidence that the behaviour had happened before the injury was sustained, the claimant will not be able to satisfy AA 1971, s 2(2)(c).
Evidence of previous incidents may be available from a dog bite register kept by the police. Alternatively, neighbours may know if a dog has a history of aggression.
If a defendant (usually the owner but can be a person in charge of the dog) has been convicted under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 (DDA 1991) for keeping a banned breed or allowing a dog to be dangerously out of control, the conviction can provide support to a claimant’s case. A claimant who wishes to rely on a relevant conviction must include it
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234