The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Judicial independence is fundamental to the rule of law. The integrity of the criminal justice system depends on a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal. Alongside these fundamental principles exists the need to ensure justice is carried out expeditiously and there is a recognised need for plea negotiations to take place. An advance indication as to likely sentence is part of this process. The Attorney General's guidelines on the acceptance of pleas emphasises the importance of transparency in the conduct of justice and, in particular, sets out a formalised process for the provision of indications on sentence in the Crown Court. These are generally known as 'Goodyear indications'.
The Court of Appeal issued guidelines that amount to the introduction of a formalised procedure of advance sentence indication in R v Goodyear. These are now contained in the Criminal Practice Directions—consolidated up to amendment No 10, CPD VII Sentencing C: Indications on sentence in force on 13 May 2020.
Goodyear indications must be conducted in open court—there should be no discussion in the judge's chambers about possible sentences and there should be no indication that a plea could make the difference between a custodial and non-custodial sentence.
Both parties will be represented and the hearing should be transcribed so there is a record of it.
Any reference to the hearing
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the question of when court proceedings can be stayed. It identifies scenarios in which a party may apply for a stay of proceedings, including to allow for: a jurisdictional challenge; arbitration; an attempt to settle; related criminal proceedings; an opportunity to
Coronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The key implications for civil appeals are set
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
What is 'discontinuance'?Discontinuance is the means by which a claimant can bring all or part of the proceedings it has instigated to an end.A claimant has a right to discontinue all or part of a claim at any time.Where proceedings are brought to an end without an order or judgment from a court, eg
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.