The following Family Q&A Produced in partnership with Matthew Fletcher of 1 Garden Court Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
It is not unknown for a parent with care to ‘disappear’. This can be for good reason, for example, fleeing domestic violence or abuse. Therefore, care needs to be taken when seeking to establish a child’s whereabouts so as to not be accused of harassment or to risk allegations of continuing to perpetrate abuse.
The legal route for identifying the whereabouts of a child is contained within section 33 of the Family Law Act 1986 (FLA 1986). This order is directed against any person whom the court ‘has reason to believe’ may have relevant information to disclose it to the court. This can include the police, a manager of a refuge or a friend or family member. An application for an order under section 8 of th
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
On the disposition of a property (whether by way of conveyance, transfer or charge), the party making the disposition will normally provide a title guarantee which implies standard form covenants for title. A landlord may give a title guarantee when granting a lease, but this is rare in practice.
You may apply simplified customer due diligence (SDD) measures in relation to particular business relationships or transactions which you determine present a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, having taken into account:•your organisation-wide risk assessment—see Practice Note:
Company directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their services will need to be
This Precedent letter covers disclosure obligations under CPR 31. It does not apply to proceedings subject to the disclosure pilot scheme under CPR PD 51U. For guidance on the disclosure pilot scheme, see Practice Note: Business and Property Courts—the disclosure pilot scheme. For a client letter on
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.