The following Practice Compliance Q&A Produced in partnership with David Sawtell of 39 Essex Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Purrunsing v A’Court & Co was an alarming case for conveyancers when it came out in April 2016. Both the buyer’s and the seller’s conveyancers were found liable (through different legal remedies) for a failure to adequately explore the seller’s entitlement to sell a property. It highlights the importance for all parties to consider the risk of fraud in a conveyance and to tailor their checks and advice accordingly.
The case itself did not need to consider whether it was necessary to ask questions about a seller’s entitlement to sell. A cautious conveyancer would, however, take away from the case the lesson that some transactions require more due diligence than others.
The case itself concerned a fraud by an individual pretending to be the registered owner of a property. The intending purchaser (P) paid his money to his conveyancer (HOC), who paid this money on to the fraudster’s solicitor (A’Court), who in turn paid it to the fraudster who then disappeared.
The property itself was high value and was not encumbered by a charge.
Both HOC and A’Court were in breach of trust by paying over the money. They both unsuccessfully applied for relief under section 61 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925). HOC was also found liable in contrac
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The roles of nominated officer and money laundering reporting officerA nominated officer is an individual who is nominated by a firm to receive disclosures under Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) or Part III of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000)—see Requirement to appoint a
There are two kinds of burden:•the legal burden, and•the evidential burdenThe legal burdenA party has the legal (sometimes called ‘the persuasive’) burden where the onus is on that party to prove a fact or issue in a case to the required standard of proof.The legal burden is generally on the
This Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear a dispute and is applied
For guidance on the basic features of the doctrine of estoppel and the different classifications it has been subject to, see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead and related content.Promissory estoppel—what is it?Where A has, by words or conduct, made to B a clear and unequivocal
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.