The following Family Q&A Produced in partnership with Max Turnell of 1 King’s Bench Walk provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In the absence of any undertaking, the recital of an agreement will be incapable of enforcement in family proceedings if the court would not have had jurisdiction to make an order in like terms (per N v N (divorce: ante-nuptial agreement)). Therefore, a recital which records a party’s agreement to obtain decree absolute as soon as possible may not be enforceable, although there is sometimes said to be an exception to the general rule where two conditions are satisfied, ie:
an order of the court consists in part of a recital containing an agreement imposing a clear obligation on a party and in part an order, and
the court would have had jurisdiction to make an order in the same terms as the recital
In Horsman v Horsman (Financial Provision), it was recited that the husband would provide the wife with a new car every three years, or after 20,000 miles, whichever was the earlier, and fund the running costs. The wife successfully enforced the recital by retrospectively varying the periodical payments order made in her favour and then enforcing the arrears. However, this appears to be a creative use of the courts’ powers in variation proceedings in order to meet the wife’s unmet ‘needs’. Particularly, ‘enforcement’ in this way would not have
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the different categories of contractual damages that may be available for financial loss (pecuniary loss), ie expectation-based damages, reliance-based damages and gains-based damages.For guidance on contractual damages generally, see Practice Note: Contractual
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
This Practice Note covers the legal framework and regulatory guidance to be considered in determining whether an arrangement constitutes a contract of insurance and the possible consequences of carrying on activities relating to a contract of insurance without the requisite regulatory permissionsThe
Definition of automatismAn act is done in a state of automatism if it is done by the body without control by the mind, (eg it is a spasm or a reflex), or if it is done by a person who is not conscious of what they are doing. The act may be described as involuntary, but will not be regarded as such
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.