The following Wills & Probate Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In White v Jones, the House of Lords allowed disappointed beneficiaries under a Will to recover damages in compensation for the lost legacy under a Will which the solicitor was instructed by the testator to prepare, but did not prepare it. We note that, in these circumstances, you are asking whether, in determining quantum, the court will take into account that, if the Will had been executed, claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) may have been brought against the estate.
You may be interested in the Court of Appeal decision in Horsfall v Haywards. In this case, concerning a claim by disappointed beneficiaries, it was argued by the negligent solicitors that damages should be reduced on the basis that if the Will had been drafted as instructed, the disappointed beneficiaries would have faced successful claims under I(PFD)A 1975. The Court of Appeal rejected this argument on the basis that the judge had been correct to find that he had too little evidence on which to reduce the damages awarded on the basis of claims under I(PFD)A 1975 and undue influence.
In Horsfall, Lord Justice Mummery said:
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
Express and implied contractual terms distinguishedContractual terms may be either express or implied:•express terms—are terms which are actually recorded in a written contract or openly expressed in an oral contract at the time the contract is made (or there may be a combination of written and oral
For guidance on the basic features of the doctrine of estoppel and the different classifications it has been subject to, see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead and related content.Promissory estoppel—what is it?Where A has, by words or conduct, made to B a clear and unequivocal
This Practice Note provides a high-level introduction to diversity and inclusion (D&I) and key reasons why it is important to law firms. Specific aspects of D&I are covered in more detail in Practice Notes:•The growing focus on diversity and inclusion (D&I) in law firms•Unconscious bias—law
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.