The following Arbitration practice note Produced in partnership with Amanda Lees and Tiffany Lee of Simmons & Simmons (Hong Kong & Singapore) provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Sophisticated commercial parties commonly include in their commercial agreements a clause to arbitrate tier disputes: such an arrangement is known as an arbitration agreement. If drafted correctly, the arbitration agreement can provide parties with greater control over how their disputes are resolved and, significantly, who will be appointed to determine the dispute.
The arbitration agreement invokes a private dispute resolution mechanism, which is capable of ousting the jurisdiction of the courts in respect of any disputes that may arise. If the arbitration is seated in, for example Hong Kong, the Hong Kong courts retain certain supervisory powers that can be invoked to support the arbitral process. These powers may be exercised by the courts at various stages: before the arbitration process has commenced; during the proceedings or even after the award has been rendered; and the arbitral proceedings have been closed.
Litigation before the Hong Kong courts provides a reliable and robust system for resolving commercial disputes. It is, however, a more formal process than arbitration and the parties are subject to a comparatively strict and rigid set of rules. In contrast, arbitration can offer a more flexible approach for resolving disputes according to the needs of the parties. The key differences between the two methods of dispute resolution are explored in further detail in the table below and include issues relating
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note covers the legal framework and regulatory guidance to be considered in determining whether an arrangement constitutes a contract of insurance and the possible consequences of carrying on activities relating to a contract of insurance without the requisite regulatory permissionsThe
Coronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. For guidance, see Practice Note: Coronavirus
This Practice Note provides guidance on claims for ‘use and occupation’ or mesne profits, and how and when double rent or double value can be claimed.Claims for use and occupationA claim for use and occupation is possible where there is occupation of land without an express agreement fixing the
This Practice Note looks at CE-File electronic working in the courts under CPR PD 51O, in the context of case management. It provides guidance on how to file a document electronically, deal with rejected electronic filings, issue a claim electronically, file electronic bundles (eBundles) for case
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.