The following Arbitration guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
During the typical course of an arbitration, the parties to the arbitration may raise a range of objections in relation to whether the tribunal has jurisdiction over certain matters. Section 34 of the Arbitration Ordinance, Chapter 609 (AO), which gives effect to article 16 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (the Model Law), states that the tribunal is itself empowered to adjudicate on these challenges as to its jurisdiction. It should be noted that AO, s 34 is intended to minimise delays in arbitral proceedings and is mandatory in nature.
The operation of AO, s 34 differs on whether the challenge as to jurisdiction is made before or after the tribunal issues an arbitral award on the merits. The following discussion focuses on challenges made before an award is issued (ie pre-award)—for challenges as to jurisdiction made after the issue of the award on the merits, see Practice Note: Hong Kong—challenging jurisdiction—post-award.
In giving effect to the Model Law, art 16(1), AO, s 34 enshrines the principles of Kompetenz-Kompetenz and separability of the arbitration clause in Hong Kong arbitration law. According to AO, s 34(1), ‘the arbitral tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction’ and ‘an arbitration clause which forms part of a contract shall
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234