The following Arbitration guidance note Produced in partnership with Simon Powell and Ing Loong YANG of Latham & Watkins (Hong Kong) provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Where one party has commenced arbitral proceedings in breach of an agreed dispute resolution process, such as where the arbitration has been commenced in the wrong seat or it was bound to submit the dispute for resolution via mediation, another party to the proceedings may seek an injunction restraining those arbitral proceedings.
The current position of the Hong Kong courts in relation to anti-arbitration injunctions is that it possesses the jurisdiction to order such injunctions.
This point was considered by Deputy High Court Judge Peter Ng SC sitting in the Court of First Instance in Lin Ming v Chen Shu Quan. The applicant seeking an anti-arbitration injunction in that case relied upon the court’s general jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief under section 21L of the High Court Ordinance, Chapter 4u (HCO), which provides that the Court of First Instance may grant an injunction where ‘just or convenient to do so’.
In response, the counterpa
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234