The following Competition practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Both the EU and the US impose on parties to transactions notification requirements when certain thresholds are met. The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that competition authorities have the opportunity to review transactions that could substantially harm competition before they are closed.
Gun jumping relates to unlawful pre-merger co-ordination or integration between the parties to a transaction. More precisely, it is a term used to describe two types of scenarios:
transactions that are closed without any notification despite thresholds having been triggered (so-called ‘failure to notify’ cases), and
substantive gun jumping (ie integration measures being taken prior to clearance—frequently while review by competition authorities is pending)
For a practical checklist of do’s and don’ts in relation to gun jumping, see Gun-jumping ’Do’s and don’ts’—checklist.
Failure to notify cases refer to cases where parties fail entirely to notify the competition authorities of a transaction triggering merger thresholds, thus violating the applicable obligation to notify a transaction prior to its implementation under Article 4(1) of the EU Merger Regulation and under section 7A of the Clayton Act, the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (HSR Act). Of course, in cases where the EUMR is not applicable, transactions may nevertheless be subject to pre-merger notification requirements at the Member State level.
Failure-to-notify cases frequently occur in less clear-cut scenarios such as staggered acquisitions
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Form of transfer of sharesThere are a number of circumstances in which shares in a company may be transferred, eg upon a sale of the shares, through the transmission of the shares by operation of law (eg upon the death or bankruptcy of a shareholder), by gift or upon the enforcement of a charge. For
Scotland: the Accountant in BankruptcyThe office of the Accountant in Bankruptcy (AiB) was created by section 156 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1856 . Previously, the functions of the AiB were limited but since 1993, with the enactment of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1993 (B(S)A 1993), the role
False imprisonmentLiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will in practice be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary
Public inquiry procedureThe procedure by which a public inquiry is conducted will vary significantly from one inquiry to the next. Even for inquiries established under the Inquiries Act 2005 (IA 2005), the associated inquiry rules are not particularly prescriptive as to how they ought to be
0330 161 1234