The following Employment practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note explains the right to a guarantee payment, which provides limited pay protection for certain employees who are laid off or put on short-time working.
In practice the question whether a guarantee payment is due will usually arise in the case of hourly paid or piece rate workers because they are most likely to be working under contracts which give the employer the right to lay off without pay.
The basic right to a guarantee payment is set out in section 28 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996). An employee is entitled to a guarantee payment for any ‘workless day’. This is a day throughout which the employee would normally be required to work but the employer does not provide the employee with work (see: The need for a ‘workless day’ below).
The employer’s failure to provide the employee with work must be for one of the prescribed reasons (see: Reasons for the failure to provide work below).
The level of pay protection is modest:
a maximum amount is payable per day
the amount payable is limited to a maximum of five days in any rolling three-month period
For further guidance, see: How a guarantee payment is calculated below.
The rules on guarantee payments are quite separate from the statutory redundancy payment scheme (as to which, see
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Elements of the offence of perverting the course of justicePerverting the course of justice is a common law offence which can only be tried on indictment in the Crown Court. The elements of the offence are:•a person acts or embarks on a course of conduct•which has a tendency to•and is intended to
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what,
Intimidation of witnesses and jurorsIntimidation of witnesses and/or jurors is an offence under section 51 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994). An offence is committed where a defendant:•does an act which intimidates, and is intended to intimidate, another person (the
What is 'discontinuance'?Discontinuance is the means by which a claimant can bring all or part of the proceedings it has instigated to an end.A claimant has a right to discontinue all or part of a claim at any time.Where proceedings are brought to an end without an order or judgment from a court, eg
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.