The following Dispute Resolution guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers the duty of full and frank disclosure, one of the requirements an applicant must satisfy to obtain a freezing injunction (or freezing order) from the court. For more general guidance on freezing injunctions, see Practice Note: Freezing injunctions—requirements.
Freezing injunctions (also known as freezing orders) are generally sought by claimants using a 'without notice' application (ie on an ex parte basis). In such circumstances the defendant will not have an opportunity to make representations on its own behalf, so there is a duty on the applicant (owed to the court) to make full and frank disclosure of all material facts to the court determining the application for the freezing injunction. The duty of full and frank disclosure extends to the applicant’s legal advisers (Fundo Soberano De Angola v dos Santos), who also have a ‘heavy’ responsibility, commensurate with the importance attached to the duty itself, to ensure their client is aware of its obligations and what they mean in practice, which includes exercising a ‘degree of supervision’ in ensuring that the duty is discharged (Fundo Soberano De Angola v dos Santos).
The leading statements of principle in this regard are found in Brink's Mat v Elcombe, where the duty of full and frank disclosure was described as a 'heavy
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234