The following Dispute Resolution guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
There are a number of different ways in which a party (applicant, defendant/respondent or affected third party) might be in breach with respect to a freezing injunction. They can include the following:
the respondent (or third party) may breach the terms of the freezing order by:
dealing with assets which are subject to the freezing order, for example by dissipating them
failing to comply with ancillary orders contained within the freezing order, for example failure to disclose all of their relevant assets in breach of an asset disclosure order, or travelling in breach of a travel restriction
the applicant may:
breach the terms of a freezing order by failing to comply with one or more of the cross-undertakings given by them on grant of the freezing injunction
breach their duty of full and frank disclosure
For more guidance on freezing injunctions, see: Freezing injunctions (orders)—overview, as well as Practice Notes:
Where the respondent (or a third party bound by the freezing injunction) breaches the terms of the freezing injunction (or undertaking not to deal with assets) by dealing with assets (ie without first obtaining an appropriate discharge or variation) they will be in contempt of court for breach of a court order or undertaking (as appropriate).
The applicant may
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234