The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
There are various situations in which a court will hold that an agreement is not binding because, though supported by consideration, it was made without any intention of creating legal relations (see, eg, Blue v Ashley).
Whether or not the parties to a contract have the requisite contractual intention is a question of fact, to be decided by reference to the particular circumstances of each case.
However, the cases recognise that, in certain situations, there is a presumption that such intention will be lacking.
In an ordinary commercial context, it is not normally necessary to prove that the parties to an express agreement in fact intended to create legal relations. Absent proof to the contrary, it will be presumed that the parties did have such intention.
The onus of proving that there was no intention is on the party who asserts that no legal effect was intended and that onus is a heavy one (Edwards v Skyways, Kingswood v Anderson and Barbudev v Eurocom Cable).
In determining whether the onus of proof has been discharged, the court will be influenced by:
the importance of the agreement to the parties
whether one of the parties has acted in reliance on the agreement
See para  of
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the law governing the procedural law of arbitration proceedings (the curial law or lex arbitri) and how it is determined under the law of England and Wales (England and English are used as convenient shorthand).The procedural law of the arbitral proceedingsThe procedural
This Practice Note discusses Term Loan B (TLB) facilities which frequently appear as a tranche of senior facilities in syndicated loans in leveraged financings. TLBs are an established feature in the US market and increasingly used in the European lending market for institutional investors.This
This Practice Note explains certain common financial covenants used in commercial finance transactions including:•minimum net worth test•gearing ratio•leverage ratio (or debt to equity ratio)•current ratio (or acid test ratio)•cashflow ratio•interest cover ratio, and•loan to value ratioIt explains:
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.