The following Construction guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A contractor or consultants’ standard of care in relation to design is a common source of disagreement between the parties to a construction project. In most cases the contractor or consultant will be trying to avoid accepting a 'fitness for purpose' obligation in relation to the design—either express or implied.
This Practice Note examines what the so-called 'fitness for purpose' obligation is, who is subject to it and who isn't, where it comes from and why contractors and consultants are keen to avoid accepting it. It also includes example clauses and considers whether a contractor should accept them.
The amount of design that a contractor or consultant may carry out under their contract or appointment will vary but, regardless of the extent of design undertaken, the principles dictating the standard of care in respect of that design will be the same.
The fitness for purpose obligation derives from legislation regarding product liability and the standards that are required to be met where goods, materials and/or services are being supplied.
Under sections 4(4) and 4(5) of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 (SGSA 1982), an implied term is imposed on the supplier of goods that, where the purchaser makes known to the supplier any particular purpose for which the goods are being supplied,
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234