The following Wills & Probate practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This is simplicity itself in the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) in that there is only one ground for the claim, namely:
'… that the disposition of the deceased's estate effected by his will or the law relating to intestacy, or the combination of his will and that law, is not such as to make reasonable financial provision for the applicant.'
Obviously, having overcome the first hurdle of successfully proving that they are a claimant, the applicant will be faced with the requirement of convincing a court that the deceased did not make reasonable provision for them. This has created a plethora of cases but I(PFD)A 1975 does attempt to define the meaning of what may be expected ordinarily to be such provision in the case of each of the respective applicants defined in I(PFD)A 1975, s1.
Having said that, I(PFD)A 1975, s 2 only distinguishes between the spouse or civil partner of the deceased, on the one hand, and all other applicants on the other. Matters are expanded upon in I(PFD)A 1975, ss 14 and 14A in relation to spouses or civil partners who die within 12 months of the termination of the marriage or civil partnership.
Help is given to the practitioner in determining whether there has been reasonable provision in that the court must take various matters into consideration when
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Unlike many other countries, the UK has no unfair competition law. Brand owners seeking to prevent competitors from marketing ‘copycat’ products or using misleading advertising have to rely on a combination of different intellectual property rights. These rights include the common law right to
This Practice Note identifies the main torts (bar negligence and nuisance, which are covered elsewhere in our related content) and their key characteristics. Specifically:•trespass to land•trespass to the person•privacy/defamation•liability for animals•employers' liability•product
Produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note summarises the rules and guidance in relation to parties who are, or may be presumed to be, acting in concert for the purposes of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). In particular the
Definition of automatismAn act is done in a state of automatism if it is done by the body without control by the mind, (eg it is a spasm or a reflex), or if it is done by a person who is not conscious of what they are doing. The act may be described as involuntary, but will not be regarded as such
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.