The following Family guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In relation to preparation for a final hearing generally see Practice Note: Preparation for the final hearing of an application for a financial remedy.
For practical guidance on cases allocated to a High Court judge, including the Statement on the Efficient Conduct of Financial Remedy Hearings (1 February 2016) (as amended) (the statement), see Practice Note: Financial remedy proceedings allocated to a High Court judge.
Key requirements as to evidence in family proceedings are contained in Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 22 and FPR 2010, PD 22A. The procedural requirements for an application for a financial remedy are contained in FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, Pt 9 and FPR 2010, PD 9A. In relation to procedure in financial remedy proceedings generally, see: Financial provision—practice and procedure—overview.
The court may control evidence by giving directions as to:
the issues on which it requires evidence
the nature of the evidence it requires to decide those issues, and
the way in which the evidence is to be placed before the court
The court has the power to exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible.
The court has the power to permit a party to adduce evidence, or seek to rely on a document, even where a party has failed to comply with the evidence requirements of FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955,
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234