The following Pensions practice note Produced in partnership with Wyn Derbyshire of gunnercooke LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Estoppel is the general term frequently given to the equitable doctrine which (broadly speaking) provides that if a person (person A) causes another person (person B) (whether by word or action, and whether expressly or impliedly) to believe that a particular set of facts or circumstances are true, then A should not later be permitted to draw back from the statements and/or actions they made or carried out which led B to such a conclusion, if it would be unjust or unconscionable for A to do so.
Over the years the doctrine has grown and developed beyond its original boundaries, and today there are various different categories of estoppel that the courts (both in England and Wales and elsewhere) have recognised and adopted to address particular cases.
Today, in most forms of the doctrine, it is insufficient for A simply to have made representations (by word or action) which are later found to be wrong and misleading; B must have relied on the representations in some way (eg by incurring expenses or embarking on a particular course of action in the belief that A's representations were accurate), and in such a way that B would not have acted but for the representation(s).
A's actions or statements need not be express as regards the specific representations upon which B subsequently
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The offence of threats to killThe offence of threats to kill is an offence which can be tried in the magistrates' court or the Crown Court. The magistrates' court is likely to decline jurisdiction if there are repeated threats or a visible weapon.Elements of the offence of threats to killThe
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what,
Coronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The key implications for civil appeals are set
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.