The following Public Law practice note Produced in partnership with Walker Morris provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In a relatively short period of time the use of e-Procurement tools to award public contracts has become standard practice. Consequently, those working in the public procurement field, for both contracting authorities and suppliers, need to have at least some familiarity with e-Procurement and many organisations employ specialists simply to deal with this aspect of the process.
This Practice Note examines the development and use of e-Procurement for sourcing in the public sector, ie the process leading to the award of a public contract or framework agreement (often referred to as ‘e-Sourcing’) which is governed by EU public procurement rules. This includes the use of e-Auctions and Dynamic Purchasing Systems (DPS) for sourcing.
It should be noted that electronic tools may be used to ‘e-Enable’ other processes too and, in particular, ‘Purchase-to-Pay’ (P2P)—the transactional process of authorising and placing orders (under contracts and framework agreements), receiving invoices and making payment for goods or services.
Technological developments have forged ahead faster than policy-making. Legislators have been slow to recognise the realities of e-Procurement within the EU public procurement rules. Reform has been incremental. However, in 2013 a more comprehensive vision was embraced with the adoption of 'End-to-end procurement to modernise public administration' which, among other things, involves the development of national strategies for end-to-end e-Procurement.
In 2015, Directive 2014/24/EU, the Public Contracts Directive, was implemented in the UK through
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Elements of the offence of perverting the course of justicePerverting the course of justice is a common law offence which can only be tried on indictment in the Crown Court. The elements of the offence are:•a person acts or embarks on a course of conduct•which has a tendency to•and is intended to
The offence of false imprisonmentFalse imprisonment is a common law offence but it is more common as a civil action in tort (see Practice Note: False imprisonment).It is triable only on indictment. It may be classified in class 2A, 2B or 3 in accordance with the Criminal Practice Directions.The
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day, ie Friday 31 January 2020, has implications for practitioners considering service out of the jurisdiction. For guidance, see: Cross border considerations—checklist—Service—Brexit specific.This Practice Note explains when an acknowledgment of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.