The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
For a claimant to succeed in proving their claim in common law negligence they must first prove that the defendant owed them a duty of care.
When assessing whether a duty of care exists, the court will consider whether there is an established precedent for the relationship between the parties and follow the precedents unless it is necessary to consider whether they should be departed from.
Common examples of situations where it is established that a duty of care is owed include:
road users to other road users (see Practice Note: Duties of the road user)
employers to employees (see Practice Note: The employer's duty of care)
occupiers of premises to visitors (see Practice Note: Occupiers' liability claims—lawful visitors)
manufacturers to consumers (see Practice Note: Product liability—claims in negligence)
professionals to their clients
parents/teachers/guardians to children (see Practice Note: Claims against schools)
The courts should normally apply established principles of law, rather than imposing a universal test for the existence of a duty of care and basing their decisions solely on public policy.
The Supreme Court has confirmed the approach that should be taken when determining whether a duty of care is owed in a novel case where established principles do not provide an answer:
the approach of the common law in such a situation is to develop
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Voluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughter consists of those killings which would be murder (because the accused has the relevant mental element for murder) but which are reduced to manslaughter because of one of the three special defences (loss of control, diminished responsibility or suicide
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what,
You may apply simplified customer due diligence (SDD) measures in relation to particular business relationships or transactions which you determine present a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, having taken into account:•your organisation-wide risk assessment—see Practice Note:
Who is a fiduciary?There is no comprehensive list of the relationships which give rise to the existence of fiduciary duties under common law. Some relationships are automatically fiduciary, eg those between trustee and beneficiary, solicitor and client, principal and agent, business partner and
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.