The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Deferred Prosecution Agreement Code of Practice (DPA Code) for prosecutors is intended to guide prosecutors through the process of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) and provide a framework within which DPAs will operate. It is important that lawyers are familiar with it to ensure that the procedure is correct and that their client organisation is negotiating on a proper basis and properly represented at each stage. See Practice Notes: Deferred prosecution agreements and DPA Code of Practice.
When dealing with the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), the DPA Code should be read in conjunction with the SFO’s chapter on corporate co-operation in its operational handbook, which is intended to assist organisations in understanding what will be expected of them in order for their work to count as co-operation for the purposes of a DPA, see Practice Note: Corporate co-operation guidance for organisations seeking a DPA.
The test to be satisfied in order for a DPA to be granted judicial approval in the UK courts is set out in the DPA Code, see further, Practice Note: Deferred prosecution agreements—The test to be satisfied before a DPA is approved.
The DPA Code does not expressly limit or restrict the types of organisations to whom a DPA may be offered. Instead it indicates the factors which will weigh in favour of and against
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When is quantum meruit and quantum valebat relevant?Claims in quantum meruit (value of services) and quantum valebat (value of goods) arise in diverse situations ranging from where contractual terms are silent on issues of payment to where there is no contract at all (Serck v Drake & Scull).General
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
An intention to create legal relations is requiredThere are various situations in which a court will hold that an agreement is not binding because, though supported by consideration, it was made without any intention of creating legal relations (see, eg, Blue v Ashley).Did the parties intend to
The right to notice means a right for the employee to remain in employment for the period of notice, not simply to be paid for it. An employer will therefore often include in the contract an express right to make a payment in lieu of notice ('PILON') as an alternative to giving notice, to ensure
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.