The following IP Q&A Produced in partnership with Joanne Frears of Lionshead Law Ltd provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Contract law generally allows a licensee to sublicense their contractual rights and obligations, unless the agreement states expressly that this is not permitted. This principal was established in British Waggon Co v Parkgate Waggon Co v Lea & Co.
The exception to this is where the contract requires a particular person to perform the contract or requires personal services from them.
Sublicensing involves the creation of a further licence which is intended to be subordinate to the head licence and which pushes some or all of the elements of performance of the contract onto the sublicensee. A written sublicence will specify the terms under which it is granted, such as the deliverables and the limits on use of the licensed rights.
The general contractual position stated above is reversed for intellectual property and under English law sublicensing of such rights can only be undertaken with express permission of the head licensor. The general consensus is that by granting a licence and not an assignment, the rights owner wishes to maintain an element of control over their rights and that providing a licensee with an automatic right to sublicense would undermine this. Although misuse or non-use of a paten
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When is quantum meruit and quantum valebat relevant?Claims in quantum meruit (value of services) and quantum valebat (value of goods) arise in diverse situations ranging from where contractual terms are silent on issues of payment to where there is no contract at all (Serck v Drake & Scull).General
What is QOCS?Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) was introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson costs reforms following the removal of a claimant’s right to recover additional liabilities from the defendant, ie success fees and after the event (ATE) insurance premiums. The relevant CPR
What is a third party debt order (TPDO)?Third party debt orders were previously known as 'garnishee' orders and operated under the regime provided for in CCR Ord 30 and RSC Ord 49 (now revoked). Although the rules in CPR 72 are new, many of the principles with which they are concerned are well
Deceit—what is it?A deceit occurs when a misrepresentation is made with the express intention of defrauding a party, subsequently causing loss to that party.The elements of a claim in deceit are:•a clear false representation of fact or law•fraud by the maker, in the sense that they knew that the
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.