Dispute resolution: key appeal cases—2019 [Archived]

The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:

  • Dispute resolution: key appeal cases—2019 [Archived]
  • Key forthcoming appeal cases—2019
  • Key civil litigation appeals in review—2019
  • UKSC—challenging the suspension of Parliament—R (Miller) v The Prime Minister; Cherry v The Advocate General for Scotland
  • Court and the legal profession
  • UKSC—whistleblowing judge—Gilham v Ministry of Justice
  • Applicable law—Rome I
  • CJEU—third party rights—BGL BNP Paribas SA v TeamBank AG Nürnberg
  • Applicable law—Rome II
  • CJEU—‘overriding mandatory provisions’—Agostinho da Silva Martins v Dekra Claims Services Portugal SA
  • More...

Dispute resolution: key appeal cases—2019 [Archived]

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. One of the difficulties for dispute resolution practitioners is keeping up to date with developments in case law that affect their practice area, or, which impact civil litigation procedure generally. This Practice Note summarises the key appeal cases (ie decisions of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, and, where relevant, some judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)), which we have reported on, allowing users ease of access in finding those decisions, see below. This content can be browsed through the table of contents in the left margin. Alternatively, this tracker can be searched using [CTRL]+[F].

In addition, this Practice Note covers a selection of forthcoming appeals, where known, to assist in horizon scanning.

This content is not intended to provide an exhaustive list of all appeals and/or key decisions relevant to dispute resolution practitioners.

Key forthcoming appeal cases—2019

TopicsCase name and date of appeal, where knownDetails of appealFurther information/reading
Terminating contracts—frustrationCanary Wharf (BP4) T1 Ltd v European Medicines Agency
[2019] EWHC 921 (Ch)
Court of Appeal—permission to appeal given in the lower court. The judge granted the European Medicines Agency (EMA) permission to appeal his decision both on the basis that an appeal would have a real prospect of success

Popular documents