The following Corporate practice note Produced in partnership with Dilpa Raval of CMS and Graham Muir of CMS provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note describes:
what is meant by 'disguised remuneration'
the basis of the disguised remuneration charge, and
the tax implications of a disguised remuneration charge
This Practice Note refers only to those aspects of the disguised remuneration legislation which apply to employee share incentives and is not intended to be a comprehensive guide to the legislation.
The Finance Act 2011 introduced Part 7A of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (ITEPA 2003), aimed at tackling what has become widely known as 'disguised remuneration' involving the use of employee benefit trusts.
Broadly, the term 'disguised remuneration' describes arrangements involving third parties (often employee benefit trusts) which benefit employees in a way that avoids or defers liabilities for income tax and national insurance contributions (NICs). The arrangements must involve a third party in order for ITEPA 2003, Pt 7A to apply—if an employer is providing a benefit directly to the employee (other than where the employer is acting as a trustee), then ITEPA 2003, Pt 7A will not apply.
In summary, if an arrangement is caught by ITEPA 2003, Pt 7A, charges to income tax (under PAYE) and NICs will arise on the occurrence of any one of a number of steps envisaged by the legislation.
ITEPA 2003, Pt 7A took effect on 6 April 2011 and the corresponding NICs legislation took effect on 6 December 2011 (although
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The Public Private Partnership (PPP) models are a popular way for governments to involve private investment, expertise and risk in procuring infrastructure, with the potential to deliver a project more efficiently and economically. One of the most popular PPP models for procuring infrastructure
This Practice Note explains certain common financial covenants used in commercial finance transactions including:•minimum net worth test•gearing ratio•leverage ratio (or debt to equity ratio)•current ratio (or acid test ratio)•cashflow ratio•interest cover ratio, and•loan to value ratioIt explains:
STOP PRESS: The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 contains provisions which, on a temporary basis (presently until 31 December 2020) impose significant limitations on the ability for a creditor to seek a winding-up order against a company. For further reading, see Practice Note: Corporate
For guidance on the basic features of the doctrine of estoppel and the different classifications it has been subject to, see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead and related content.Promissory estoppel—what is it?Where A has, by words or conduct, made to B a clear and unequivocal
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.