The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A disqualification order is made to protect the public from those who, for reasons of dishonesty, naivety or incompetence, abuse their role and status as a director. Where a defendant has been convicted of an indictable offence, tried either on indictment or summarily, in connection with the promotion, formation, management or liquidation or striking off of a company, the sentencing court may make an order disqualifying the defendant from being a director under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986). This means the defendant must not, without leave of the court, be:
a director of a company
a liquidator or administrator of a company
a receiver or manager of a company's property, and
in any way, directly or indirectly, concerned or take part in the promotion, formation or management of a company
A disqualification order must be for a specified term starting from the end of the period of 21 days' beginning with the date of the order. It is general in effect and the court has no power to limit or specify the type of company the defendant must not be involved in the control of.
The conviction must be in connection with the promotion, management or liquidation of a company. The correct test to be applied in determining whether an indictable offence was an offence in connection with the management of a company
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
On 29 August 2015, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the PRA Rulebook (Rulebook). The transition from the Handbook to the Rulebook was intended to benefit PRA-authorised firms, to access clearer and more concise rules. Alongside the Rulebook, supervisory statements and statements
What is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.Final judgments by
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what,
There may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the shoes of one of the original parties. This is
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.