The following PI & Clinical Negligence guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
As noted in the Practice Note: Establishing the dangerous condition of highways, the burden is on the claimant to establish a breach of section 41 of the Highways Act 1980 (HiA 1980) duty to maintain. However, once a breach has been established, a highway authority will have a statutory defence if it can prove it took such care as was reasonable in all the circumstances to ensure that the section of the highway was safe. The burden of proof is on the defendant.
HiA 1980, s 58(2) sets out the matters that the court will consider when assessing whether the defence will succeed:
the character of the highway and the traffic that might be expected to use it
the standard of maintenance appropriate for a highway of that character and used by such traffic
the state of repair in which a reasonable person would expect to find the highway
whether the highway authority knew, or ought to have known, that the condition of the highway to which the cause of action relates was likely to cause danger
where the highway authority could not reasonably have been expected to repair that part of the highway before the cause of action arose what warning notices of its condition had been displayed
In the majority of highway claims, the key issue
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234