The following TMT practice note Produced in partnership with 5RB provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note examines the role of publication in an action for defamation or malicious falsehood. It reviews key case law and legislation, and considers who may be primarily and secondarily responsible for publication, what constitutes publication, the nature of publication on the internet and jurisdictional issues.
It is an essential ingredient of an action for libel or slander that there has been communication of a defamatory statement to a person other than the claimant.
For a written publication to occur, the words in question must be read and understood by a third party.
For an oral publication to occur, the words must be apprehended and understood by a third party.
In practice a claimant brings one action in relation to multiple publications. Each communication is, in principle, a separate and distinct publication giving rise to a separate cause of action although section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013 (DA 2013) has moderated this principle for the purposes of the limitation of the action (see below).
You may wish to refer to Duncan and Neill on Defamation (fifth edition, 2020) available subject to a Lexis®Library subscription.
At common law, anyone who involves themselves in the communication of a defamatory statement may, in principle, be liable for that publication. Potential defendants include:
the commercial publisher
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
What is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.Final judgments by
What is quia timet relief?Injunctions are generally awarded where a party has already suffered a wrong. For guidance on injunctions generally, see Practice Note: Injunctions—guiding principles. However, an injunction may be sought before a party's rights have been infringed on the basis that they
Codicils may be used for making any alteration in a Will such as to alter the executors or make changes in legacies, whether by addition or deletion but that is by no means their only use. As a general rule, substantial changes are best achieved by means of a new Will and codicils are more
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.