The following Property guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Prudential Assurance v PRG Powerhouse first highlighted the potential use of a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) for 'guarantee stripping', where the beneficiary of a contractual guarantee is precluded from enforcing it. In Powerhouse, the directors proposed a CVA, which was approved at a creditors' meeting, purporting to constitute an express release by the claimants of their rights against persons other than Powerhouse. The effect, in relation to retail premises that had become surplus to requirements, was to bar enforcement by landlords of parent company guarantees.
In Powerhouse, the court stated that it had 'no doubt' that the particular CVA proposal was 'unfairly prejudicial'. The CVA left the guaranteed landlords in a worse position than without the CVA, having regard both to present and future liabilities. However, the court emphasised that there is no single and universal test for judging unfairness in the context of section 6 of the Insolvency Act 1986. It is necessary to consider all the circumstan
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234