The following IP practice note produced in partnership with Boyes Turner LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Anti-counterfeiting work is an area in which costs can quickly spiral out of control and success can be difficult to measure. In tough economic times, justifying the resources being spent on anti-counterfeiting measures can be a challenge. However, having a clear strategy with well-defined priorities, enforcement preferences and a designated team will result in a more streamlined and hence cost-effective approach. For further information about anti-counterfeiting, see Practice Note: Anti-counterfeiting.
Any effective anti-counterfeiting strategy will include:
an initial assessment of the extent of the problem and the strength of existing IP rights
a clear budget approved at the appropriate level within the business
a list of priorities
a preferred plan of action in terms of enforcement strategies
a designated team with clear responsibilities and reporting lines, and
a regular review process in order to measure success
The first step in any anti-counterfeiting strategy is to assess the level of the problem and identify trends.
Information can be gained from:
in-house personnel who have close involvement with the market place, including customer services staff who handle consumer complaints
external investigators tasked with assessing the level of counterfeit products in particular market places (both online and in stores) and making test purchases
agencies such as the Chartered Trading Standards Institute (also known as ‘Trading Standards’) and HMRC
Key information includes:
the territories which are most affected—key territories need
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Facilitating the performance of a duty by public officialsFacilitation payments, also known as facilitating or grease payments, are generally small amounts of money paid to public officials or others as a means of ensuring that they perform their duty, whether more promptly or at all. In some
Fraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the deceived for the Fraud Act 2006
This Practice Note covers the legal framework and regulatory guidance to be considered in determining whether an arrangement constitutes a contract of insurance and the possible consequences of carrying on activities relating to a contract of insurance without the requisite regulatory permissionsThe
The principles of the notarial act are that it is:•an act of the notary and not of the parties named in the document•a record of a fact, event or transaction•in the form of a document, notwithstanding the form of the underlying document, fact, event or transactionThe purpose of the notarial act is
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.