The following Dispute Resolution guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Note that the Costs Capping List Pilot Scheme is running in the Business and Property Courts from 14 January 2018 for to years. For guidance, see Practice Note: Business and Property Courts—Capped Costs List pilot scheme.
Sections 88 to 90 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 provide a statutory regime for cost capping in judicial review proceedings, including providing for a dedicated cost capping order for judicial review. For more information, see Practice Note: Judicial review litigation—frequently asked questions and Practice Note: Costs for judicial review—protective costs orders (PCOs), judicial review costs capping orders (JRCCOs) and interveners.
See also News Analysis: CPR changes in August 2016—judicial review costs capping orders.
Costs capping orders (CCOs) and protective costs orders (PCOs) both place limits on the amount of costs to be paid in proceedings. However, it is important to distinguish between them, as the source of the court’s power in respect of the two is entirely separate, and the function and purpose of the two types of orders are very different. In summary:
CCOs limit the level of future costs a party can recover by a subsequent costs order (CPR 3.19(1))
PCOs limit the level of costs a losing party will have to pay (CPR 44.18)
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234