The following Dispute Resolution guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Parties are required to file budget discussion reports (BD reports) with the court. The reports are designed to assist the judge in understanding what costs have been agreed between the parties and which costs are disputed and why. Each party has to prepare its own report on its opponent’s costs and the court will consider the report alongside the costs budget when determining the amount it will approve. For more detailed information, see Practice Note: Costs budget discussion reports (BD reports).
CPR 3.5(4) provides that:
in performing its costs management functions, the court has oversight of both the incurred and estimated future costs (budgeted costs), and
the extent to which the parties disagree with one another's budgets should be recorded
In conjunction with CPR 3.5(4), CPR 3.18(c) provides that the court’s comments recorded on the costs budget can be taken into account at the detailed assessment stage.
CPR PD 3E, para 7.4 provides that as part of the costs management process the court may not approve costs incurred before the date of any costs management hearing. The court may, however, record its comments on those costs and will take those costs into account when considering the reasonableness and proportionality of all budgeted costs.
For guidance, see: Costs budgeting—completing Precedent
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234