The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In some instances someone may suffer damage that results partly from their own fault and partly from the fault of someone else. A claim in respect of such damage is not defeated as a result of the claimant partially causing the damage themselves. Instead, the court reduces the damages recoverable according to the proportion of the claimant’s responsibility for the damage.
The prerequisite for contributory negligence is therefore causative fault on both sides. The court must apportion to fairly reflect respective responsibility. This can be subdivided into two parts:
the comparative blameworthiness of the parties’ actions
the comparative causal potency of the parties’ actions
A finding of contributory negligence will therefore depend on the facts of each case. The burden is on the defendant to prove:
the claimant failed to take reasonable care for their own safety
this contributed to the damage
it was reasonably foreseeable that the claimant would suffer harm
The defendant should plead contributory negligence at the earliest opportunity (certainly in the defence) and set out how the claimant’s failure to take reasonable care contributed either to the cause of the accident or the injuries or both.
Set out below are the types of road traffic accidents where findings of contributory negligence are often found.
Rules 99 — 102 of the Highway Code require that all drivers and passengers wear seat belts where they are
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The Public Private Partnership (PPP) models are a popular way for governments to involve private investment, expertise and risk in procuring infrastructure, with the potential to deliver a project more efficiently and economically. One of the most popular PPP models for procuring infrastructure
This Practice Note explains certain common financial covenants used in commercial finance transactions including:•minimum net worth test•gearing ratio•leverage ratio (or debt to equity ratio)•current ratio (or acid test ratio)•cashflow ratio•interest cover ratio, and•loan to value ratioIt explains:
This Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the lack of privity, a contract has an indirect effect on a third
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.