The following Pensions practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
THIS PRACTICE NOTE ONLY APPLIES TO DEFINED BENEFIT OCCUPATIONAL PENSION SCHEMES
Desmond & Sons Ltd (Desmonds) was a clothing manufacturer based in Northern Ireland and the sole employer of the Desmond & Sons 1975 Pensions and Life Assurance Scheme (the Desmond Scheme). Desmonds was at all material times a solvent company. Marks & Spencer plc (M&S) was its only customer until 3 February 2004 when M&S announced that it was terminating its business relationship with Desmonds.
The Desmond Scheme had an estimated buy-out deficit of £10.9m but was fully funded on the Minimum Funding Requirement (MFR) basis. Desmonds injected £4m into the Desmond Scheme in May 2004 to remove the funding deficit on an ongoing basis.
On 3 June 2004, Desmonds entered into Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL). While an MVL is normally treated as a solvent liquidation, there was a loophole in Northern Ireland legislation at the time which meant that Desmonds was treated as an insolvent company for the purposes of calculating the debt owed by Desmonds to the Desmond Scheme. As a result, Desmonds’ employer debt was calculated on the weak MFR basis rather than the much stronger buy-out basis.
The director shareholders of Desmonds therefore realised a greater value (approximately £26m) from the liquidation of the company than would otherwise have been the case. From this, the director shareholders received dividends totalling £17.2m.
The trustees were
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the different categories of contractual damages that may be available for financial loss (pecuniary loss), ie expectation-based damages, reliance-based damages and gains-based damages.For guidance on contractual damages generally, see Practice Note: Contractual
Broadly, the doctrine of overreaching enables purchasers (which includes tenants and mortgagees) in good faith for money or money’s worth to rely solely on the legal title. In the case of registered land, this means the entries entered on the register of title, as it records ownership of the legal
Company directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their services will need to be
A certificate of title (also known as a certificate on title) is a particular species of report on title.When solicitors are instructed to investigate title to land (for instance, when land is being acquired or offered up as security), they will write a report on title for their client, which sets
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.