The following Environment practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Anyone who is an 'appropriate person' may be liable for remediation of contaminated land under Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (EPA 1990).
An 'appropriate person' is any:
person who causes or knowingly permits contaminating substances to be in, on or under the land in question (Class A), or
owner or occupier of contaminated land, but only where a Class A person cannot be found (Class B)
See Practice Note: Contaminated land—identifying Class A and B appropriate persons.
Where contaminated land is identified, the enforcing authority must serve a remediation notice on each 'appropriate person' specifying what they must do by way of remediation.
Where there are two or more appropriate persons, liability is apportioned between the parties in accordance with the statutory guidance—see Practice Note: Contaminated land—process for determining liability.
Where there is no appropriate person, the enforcing authority will need to determine who should pay for remediation. In most cases, the costs of an orphan linkage will be borne by the public purse—see Practice Note: Contaminated land—orphan linkages.
According to the Environment Agency's (EA) report on Dealing with contaminated land in England, published in April 2016, at the majority of remediated sites, the responsibility for carrying out remediation fell to either the LA or the EA. Although the Class A polluters were often pursued, they could either not be found or
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.What is a Part 8 claim?A Part 8 claim is a claim
NOTE: This Practice Note is being reviewed in light of the changes to CPR 81 that will be introduced by the Civil Procedure (Amendment No 3) Rules 2020, SI 2020/747, which is available here. The changes to CPR 81 involve a substitution of the entirety of CPR 81, which will be renamed ‘Part 81
This Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Breach of
Produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note summarises the rules and guidance in relation to parties who are, or may be presumed to be, acting in concert for the purposes of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). In particular the
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.