The following Commercial practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note looks principally at the business context, as opposed to pure legal framework, when drafting consumer standard terms and conditions which are subject to the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015). As well as providing brief details on the consumer legislation that applies (and links to relevant Practice Notes), it also looks at the business context in which the terms and conditions operate and how lawyers can add value to them and the business which they are advising.
For more information on terms and conditions generally, see Practice Notes:
Standard terms and conditions—advantages and disadvantages
Standard terms and conditions—incorporation
Key terms and conditions in contracts
For our suite of template business-to-consumer (B2C) contracts and drafting tips, see ‘Drafting contracts with consumers’ in: Consumer protection contractual relationships—overview and Drafting consumer contracts—checklist.
For information on the drafting of boilerplate clauses in B2C contracts, see Practice Notes: Boilerplate clauses in business-to-consumer contracts—general principles and Boilerplate clauses in business-to-consumer contracts—specific clauses.
In comparison with contracts concluded between two businesses, the room for manoeuvre when drafting terms and conditions for consumers and implementing them is considerably limited. This is because of the rules on unfair terms in consumer contracts set out in the CRA 2015.
The CRA 2015 states, in particular, that:
an unfair term of a consumer contract is not binding on the consumer
a term is unfair if,
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When is quantum meruit and quantum valebat relevant?Claims in quantum meruit (value of services) and quantum valebat (value of goods) arise in diverse situations ranging from where contractual terms are silent on issues of payment to where there is no contract at all (Serck v Drake & Scull).General
The offence of causing grievous bodily harm with intentWounding or causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent is triable only in the Crown Court on indictment. Elements of the offence Under the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (OATPA 1861), the prosecution must prove the defendant unlawfully
Produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note summarises the rules and guidance in relation to parties who are, or may be presumed to be, acting in concert for the purposes of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). In particular the
This Practice Note considers claims for damages for breach of statutory duty. For guidance on claims for damages for a negligent breach of duty of care outside a statutory duty, see Practice Notes:•Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?•Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Breach of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.