The following Construction practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The second edition of the Pre-Action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes (the Protocol) provides for a procedure whereby the parties can appoint a 'protocol referee' to give directions for the conduct of the Protocol process or to settle issues of non-compliance with the Protocol. The Protocol Referee Procedure (PRP) was developed and published jointly by the Technology and Construction Solicitors’ Association (TeCSA) and the Technology and Construction Bar Association (TECBAR). A copy of the PRP is available here:
The decision of a referee is binding on the parties in the Protocol process—see The decision of the referee below. However, until a decision has been issued by the referee, the Protocol process is unaffected by the PRP, ie the time periods continue to run under the Protocol (PRP para 1.6).
Both parties must agree in order for the procedure to be used. The claimant should state whether it wishes the PRP to apply in its letter of claim and the defendant provide its position in the letter of acknowledgement. The PRP can be commenced by either party at any time during the Protocol process by making an application to the Chair of TeCSA for the nomination of a referee, but cannot be made once proceedings have been commenced (see PRP, paras 1.1 and 1.5).
The application must be made using the
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
BREXIT: UK is leaving EU on Exit Day (as defined in the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018). This has an impact on this Practice Note. For further guidance on the impact of Brexit on e-money requirements, see Practice Note: Impact of Brexit: Payment services and electronic money directives—quick
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
Background to the Single RulebookHistorically, the European Commission (Commission) favours using Directives (rather than Regulations) to set out its legislation in respect of the financial services sector. However, Directives, allowing Member States greater flexibility in how they implement
This Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of mistake on the contract and
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.