The following Construction practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers the meaning and relevance of concurrent delay on construction projects, contractual terms dealing with concurrent delay and the contractor’s entitlement to an extension of time and/or loss and expense where there is concurrent delay.
Concurrent delay describes the situation on a construction project which is suffering delay in which two or more independent events have occurred which, if either had occurred on its own, would have caused critical delay to the project. Typically, one of the events causing delay will be at the employer's risk (sometimes referred to as a ‘relevant event’), while the other will either be at the contractor's risk or will be a neutral event (ie it is at neither the contractor’s nor the employer’s risk, such as adverse weather). Such delays may occur at exactly the same time (although this is rare) or they may overlap to some degree. Applying the normal test of ‘but for’ causation, neither event can be said to have caused the delay.
In summary, and as explained in more detail in this Practice Note:
concurrent delay means ‘a period of project overrun which is caused by two or more effective causes of delay which are of approximately equal causative potency’
the delay events need not occur at the same time—it is the delaying effect of the two events which is relevant
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When restructuring is considered rather than formal insolvency proceedings (see Practice Note: Benefits of restructuring over formal proceedings) the company may want to ensure that relevant creditors quickly enter a standstill agreement to gain some breathing space to consider a restructuring
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
Produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note summarises the rules and guidance in relation to parties who are, or may be presumed to be, acting in concert for the purposes of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). In particular the
Codicils may be used for making any alteration in a Will such as to alter the executors or make changes in legacies, whether by addition or deletion but that is by no means their only use. As a general rule, substantial changes are best achieved by means of a new Will and codicils are more
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.