The following Competition practice note Produced in partnership with Dentons provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The concept of concerted practice laid down in Article 101(1) TFEU enables the European Commission (Commission), national competition authorities and national courts to prohibit certain forms of anti-competitive conduct among undertakings, which do not qualify as agreements.
For an overview of Article 101(1) TFEU, see further, The prohibition on restrictive agreements.
Article 101 TFEU draws a distinction between agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings (which we will not examine here) and concerted practices.
The notion of an agreement implies that the parties adhere to a common plan that limits or is likely to limit their individual commercial conduct by determining how they will act or abstain from acting in the market.
The concept of concerted practices refers to undertakings that knowingly engage in collusive behaviour to reduce uncertainty in the market. In contrast to an agreement, such collusive behaviour does not require the participants to adhere to a common plan that defines their actions in the market. Rather, it is enough if the participants 'knowingly adopt or adhere to collusive devices which facilitate the coordination of their commercial behaviour'.
The concepts of agreement and concerted practice are often used in combination or interchangeably by the regulators to capture different forms of harmful coordination and collusive activities between independent economic operators: where the investigative authority cannot prove that the investigated undertakings
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note explains certain common financial covenants used in commercial finance transactions including:•minimum net worth test•gearing ratio•leverage ratio (or debt to equity ratio)•current ratio (or acid test ratio)•cashflow ratio•interest cover ratio, and•loan to value ratioIt explains:
Coronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. For guidance, see Practice Note: Coronavirus
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
This Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear a dispute and is applied
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.