The following Competition practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A common IP dispute is where one party—in this note usually the claimant—alleges infringement of its patent and the defendant challenges the patent’s validity.
Such disputes are frequently settled by agreement, and those agreements have the potential to infringe Article 101(1) TFEU. The European Commission has issued guidance on this issue.
On 21 March 2014, the Commission adopted revised guidelines on the application of Article 101 TFEU to technology transfer agreements. Section IV, Part 3 of those guidelines concern settlement of IP disputes and the main points are:
settlements which include a licence from the claimant to the defendant or an agreement by the claimant not to assert IP are not anti-competitive per se. Indeed they are pro-competitive as they have an unblocking effect
there may still be aspects of such agreements that infringe Article 101(1) TFEU, but the block exemption applies provided there are no hardcore restrictions, such as price restrictions
Pitfall 1—in particular, one potentially objectionable aspect is identified: cross-licensing, in settlement of a dispute where each party alleges infringement by the other. The guidelines are particularly concerned about cross-licensing which:
imposes restrictions which go beyond what is necessary to resolve the dispute, especially restrictions on licensing to third parties
extends to future developments if it inhibits incentives to innovate, particularly where there is no other significant
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
RobberyRobberyRobbery is a theft offence, involving dishonesty but elevated also by the intention to use force.Robbery can only be tried in the Crown Court on indictment and is categorised as a class 3 offence.Elements of the offence of robberyA person is guilty of robbery if:•they steal something,
False imprisonmentLiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will in practice be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary
Escrow accounts and escrow agreementsThis Practice Note examines why parties involved in a construction project may enter into an escrow agreement (or escrow deed) to set up an escrow account. It looks at the benefits of paying funds into escrow, how an escrow account operates and the provisions
Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and
0330 161 1234