The following Competition practice note Produced in partnership with Collyer Bristow LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A common IP dispute is where one party—in this note usually the claimant—alleges infringement of its patent and the defendant challenges the patent’s validity.
Such disputes are frequently settled by agreement, and those agreements have the potential to infringe Article 101(1). The European Commission has issued guidance on this issue.
On 21 March 2014, the Commission adopted revised guidelines on the application of Article 101 TFEU to technology transfer agreements. Section IV, Part 3 of those guidelines concern settlement of IP disputes and the main points are:
settlements which include a licence from the claimant to the defendant or an agreement by the claimant not to assert IP are not anti-competitive per se. Indeed they are pro-competitive as they have an unblocking effect
there may still be aspects of such agreements that infringe Article 101(1) TFEU, but the block exemption applies provided there are no hardcore restrictions, such as price restrictions
Pitfall 1—in particular, one potentially objectionable aspect is identified: cross-licensing, in settlement of a dispute where each party alleges infringement by the other. The guidelines are particularly concerned about cross-licensing which:
imposes restrictions which go beyond what is necessary to resolve the dispute, especially restrictions on licensing to third parties
extends to future developments if it inhibits incentives to innovate, particularly where there is no other significant competitor
Paragraphs equivalent to the above existed
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Dividends involve a distribution of cash or a distribution of non-cash assets (known as a distribution in kind or a distribution in specie).A scrip dividend (in a tax context, sometimes referred to as a stock dividend) allows a shareholder to receive new shares in a company as an alternative to a
The primary function of office-holders in personal and corporate insolvency is to collect in the assets belonging to a company or individual and to distribute these to the company's or individual's creditors. Office-holders have various duties and powers in order to ensure that they do this. For
You may apply simplified customer due diligence (SDD) measures in relation to particular business relationships or transactions which you determine present a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, having taken into account:•your organisation-wide risk assessment—see Practice Note:
LiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will in practice be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary of State for
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.