The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The most common way for evidence to be adduced is through the testimony of a witness. A witness is said to be competent if they can, as a matter of law, be called by a party to give evidence. All people are deemed competent to give evidence, whatever their age, at every stage in criminal proceedings, with two exceptions:
a person is not competent to give evidence in criminal proceedings if it appears to the court that they are not able to understand questions put to them as a witness and give answers to them that can be understood
a person charged in criminal proceedings is not competent to give evidence in the proceedings for the prosecution (whether they are tried alone or with a co-accused) (see further below: The accused—evidence on behalf of the prosecution)
There are no presumptions or preconceptions tied into this statutory test. There can be no challenge to competence based on chronological age or mental capacity, for example, without demonstrating that the person in question cannot understand or answer questions.
It is for the judge or magistrates to decide on the competence of prospective witnesses and they may do so on the basis of evidence. Section 54 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA 1999), sets out the procedure to be followed
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
What is QOCS?Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) was introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson costs reforms following the removal of a claimant’s right to recover additional liabilities from the defendant, ie success fees and after the event (ATE) insurance premiums. The relevant CPR
This Practice Note is an archive of news from the Loan Market Association (LMA) on LMA documentation and related topics. It covers LMA updates from early 2013 to January 2016. For the latest LMA developments since January 2016, see Practice Note: Loan Market Association (LMA)—latest news on
This Precedent letter covers disclosure obligations under CPR 31. It does not apply to proceedings subject to the disclosure pilot scheme under CPR PD 51U. For guidance on the disclosure pilot scheme, see Practice Note: Business and Property Courts—the disclosure pilot scheme. For a client letter on
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.